Jumat, 21 April 2017

THESIS RIVIEW ANTONYMY SEMANTICS



Review Article About Semantics

Reviewed By  : Yulia Hariyani
Title               : Antonymy
Post By           : Carita Paradis & Caroline Willners, Lund University
Pages              : 22


ANTONYMY
            Semantics is the study of a meaning, we known about antonym is the opposite of meaning between a word and the other word in the same part of speech, and we have known some word has the opposite.
 Carita Paradis and Caroline Willners discuss this article on a Antonymy from convention to making meaning, This article from used the experiment methodology,
The antonym that will be done on their research are:

1. Antonym In Dictionaries

         Which means the antonym in the dictionary, in the Carita and Caroline study that the majority of the dictionary in the dictionary found more as an adjective as much as 59%, while the noun 19%, then the verb 13%, said description and preposition only 9% .
In the adjectives there are names that are gradable and non gradable

Example:

Gradable: good - bad
                 Dead - live

Non gradable : male - female



2. Antonym In Corpora

         In antonym the corpora is not so identical that the important is clear and easy to understand, then shows different phrases, in antonym there are direct and indirect Verse.

Example:
 Directly: girl-boy / wet - dry
Indirectly: boy - female / wet- soggy



3. Antonym in psycholinguistic

       In this experiment the psycholinguistic antonym in question is to identify words with other word pairs, the degree of antonym is influenced by three parameters, namely that two words are literally but opposed, the dimensions of denotative opposition are quite clear, and the opposition of two symmetric words around the center of the dimension .

Example: dumb-stupid

4. Content, configuration and construal antonym

        It is antonym that has aspects of construction, text and discourse as well as aspects of memory and thinking. Antonimi, in this view, is a construal of thought and lexical items are antonyms when they are used contrastively to the contrary. Where it relates to events, phenomena, etc.


5. Categorization by the content structure

      Category by content structure where structured antonym structure categories are based on the forms of the antonym continuum good, antonym better, and antonym very well. In this experiment more experiments on the opposite adjectives. Research and search were conducted at the British National Corpus (BNC).
Example in search adjectives on the web: Beautiful, poor, big, fast, interesting, strong, wide, thin, and etc.

6. Categorization by construal configuration

       Couples contrary to meaning and meaning that have not understood all types of construal formation of the 3 main components LOC Content, configuration, and construal.
For example: "this camera is expensive" so the opposite pair actually means "this camera is cheap".



7. Conventionalization of the antonym pair

      Conventional antonym couples show that as opposed to couples requiring more specific and easy to investigate constexts. In this case the investigation in the dictionary is more adjective than the noun, since many adjectives exhibit a singular property whereas the noun consists of many properties. An easy example in the investigation is the adjective: slow-fast, Dead-Life.

      The Conventionalization also shows the meaning of abstract and concrete meaning. Examples of abstract pairs such as victory-defeat, advantages, pessimism-optimism, and concrete pairs such as lender-borrowers, buyers-sellers, heroes, bitches.


Strengness this article are:
The advantages of this article are many of the various researchs sources undertaken, thus adding insight.

Weakness of this article is:

The lack of this article is too much explanation, and gives only a few examples, so it's a bit hard to understand.

Conclusion:

Antonim is an oppositet of meaning and meaning, in this article describes various forms of antonyms, and this article explains more of the antonyms obtained in dictionaries and the web,

Sabtu, 25 Maret 2017

ARTICLE REVIEW


Review Article About Semantics

Reviewed By  : Yulia Hariyani
Title                 : Semantic A Comparison Between Metaphor and Simile
Post By           : Iman Juniarto Raharjo, Sanata Dharma University
Pages              : 6 ( Six )



A COMPARISON BETWEEN METAPHOR AND SIMILE

Semantic is the study of a meaning, Imam Juniarto Raharjo discuss this article on A Comparison Between Metaphor and Simile, from analysis methodology that According to Webster's New World College Dictionary (2010), an allegory is the expression. And according to The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2013) also writes that figurative language is an expression using non-literal manner.
As for the difference between metaphor and simile, metaphor is a word or phrase that is to do a comparison, while the simile is an allegory or parable, but both have the same functionality as the words that connect words, for example:

Metaphor         :   1. Time is money,
                            2. Their home was  a prison.

Simile              :    1. As brave as a lion
                            2. As Blind as a bat

Strengness this article are:
The language easily understand

Weakness of this article is:
Giving a little examples

Conclusion:
  That the allusion is something that is difficult to understand, but can embellish a language.

Sabtu, 11 Maret 2017

SEMANTICS ARTICLE REVIEW


ARTICLE REVIEW

 INTERPRETING SEMANTIC EXTENSION: METAPHOR AND METONYMY ON DIFFERENT LEVELS OF LEXICAL CATEGORIZATION
NICK RIEMER Centre for Cross-Cultural Research, Australian National University
nick.riemer@anu.edu.au

Nick Riemer has defined the concept of using categoriesMetaphor and Metonymy on Different Levels of Lexical Categorization”. explain the relationship between the meaning of the polysemous lexeme metaphor in 1980, and metonymy in 1999. Metaphor, 'is a cognitive mechanism whereby one domain experience partial "mapped", ie projected, to a different domain experience that second domain is partially understood in terms of the first' , Metonymy, on the contrary, 'is a conceptual projection in which one domain of experience (target) is partially understood in terms of domain experience of the other (source) included in the same domain common experience' (Barcelona 2000: 4; oblique original).
In the first part of this article, Nick Riemer presented conception of "Methapor and Methonimi." Obviously that Methaphor used as a model for other concepts that are not related to (target), 'the baby has a cold'. And methonimi used as a model for others and there is no relationship or similarity mapping is established between the vehicle and the target "Having come they sat down, they danced out in the open."
Furthermore, Nick Riemer problem of spurious sense division Analysis based on metaphor and metonymy has become increasingly common in discussions of lexical semantics, but it faces a challenge because of the distinction on which it depends between ‘core’ and ‘extended’ senses.  There are two cases in particular where reluctance to recognize ‘separate’ meanings might be appropriate  First, the so-called ‘actual-potential’ polysemies like ‘hit’ and ‘kill’, which are widespread and culturally entrenched in Australian languages (O’Grady 1960; Dixon 1980: 103).
On the second and last of this writing, Nick Riemer expanded variety of definitions of "Metaphor and Metonymy on Different Levels of Lexical Categorization" he discusses the meaning of difference and referent typicality The claim of this paper is that metaphor and metonymy retain significant explanatory usefulness in spite of the restriction of Reviews their applicability to metalanguage glosses. discuss where the differences between each of meaning. While his analysis largely tasty, heedless of the general sense of Metaphor and Metonymy on Different Levels of Lexical Categorization. Throughout the article, he never explained the meaning of the meaning of words such as 'The woman is hitting the dog with a stick.', 'The baby has a cold'. Is this a deliberate omission or careless oversight is not clear, but it weakens the definition of Nick Riemer, because the meaning is not easy to understand and does not give a preemptive response to the argument. Nevertheless, the work of Nick Riemer still provide a clue to the meaning of the word.